My analysis of this image...
![]() |
| Twirling Clare: Lobster Dress. 2013. Twirling Clare: Lobster Dress. [ONLINE] Available at: http://twirlingclare.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/lobster-dress.html. [Accessed 14 October 2013]. |
I think it is safe to say
this is a staged shoot. This portrait shot shows a very controversial scenario.
A beautifully made up Wallis Simpson standing alone in a wood, holding branches
in both hands.
When you consider photo
shoots conducted outdoors in a woodland environment, you envision a fresh and
spacious scenario. However the background in this photograph comes across as
quite sinister. The light falls on part of the background on the left of the
image making dispersed thin shapes. The branches held by Simpson in the
foreground also share the same qualities, looking almost like weapons with the
grasp she has on them. The dark, eerie side of the background helps the
statement Schiaparelli dress to stand out in its crisp white formation.
The dress Simpson is wearing
in the photograph, I feel, is a hidden focal point. Predicting the scandal that
would emerge from this shoot, the image consultants were clever to reduce the
attention through the chosen background and through Simpson’s body language.
A lobster is obviously found
in an ocean/sea environment, the opposite habitat to the forest/woodland
background that Simpson is shot in front of. The clash of the background takes
focus away from the erotically interpreted lobster that has been shrewdly
positioned from the crotch area of the dress, down the leg. In 1937 when this
image was taken, fashion was yet to make that more definitive transition into
surrealist fashion and therefore it would have been considered quite taboo for
any woman to be sporting such a sexually exploiting design on their attire.
The white of the dress
suggests purity and innocence, corrupted not only by the positioning of the
large lobster design but also by the sash across the middle which accentuates
Simpson’s figure in a sexually provocative manner.
The shawl Simpson is wearing
over her shoulders somewhat protects her modesty however it’s a sheer material
that daringly still shows skin.
Simpson is photographed from
a distance, her entire body is visible and she stands alone. She’s not opting
for a glamour pose as such and stands quite awkwardly for a posed shoot. Simpson
is seen gazing out of the shot with an expression of vulnerability and concern.
She looks lost in thought and yearning for aid. She’s holding handfuls of
branches, an unusual stance which contributes to the disguising of the lobster
on her dress.
Simpson’s costume and hair
and makeup would make more sense in a formal, social function environment and
not outdoors in the woods. She wasn’t particularly loved by the general public
and I feel this is a rebellion against their tarnish. She embraces her bad
reputation by wearing such a risqué design on her dress so boldly.

No comments:
Post a Comment